Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Date: 2018-11-27 15:00:08
Message-ID: 793.1543330808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net> writes:
> And below are the times generated by EXPLAIN ANALYZE:

> 10.5
> Planning time: 126.080 ms
> Execution time: 2.306 ms

> 11.0
> Planning Time: 7.238 ms
> Planning Time: 2.638 ms

> 11.5 (I assume you mean 11.1 here)
> Planning Time: 15138.533 ms
> Execution Time: 2.310 ms

There were no changes between 11.0 and 11.1 that look like they'd affect
planning time. Nor does it seem particularly credible that planning time
would have dropped by a factor of 15 between 10.x and 11.x, especially
not given that the resulting plan didn't change. I think you've got some
external factor causing long planning times --- maybe something taking an
exclusive lock on one of the tables, or on pg_statistic?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-27 15:02:38 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-11-27 14:54:39 Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sanyo Moura 2018-11-27 15:11:49 Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0
Previous Message Sanyo Moura 2018-11-27 14:16:41 Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0