|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|To:||John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It didn't take that long to rebase the remaining parts of the
> patchset, so despite what I said above I went ahead and put them in
> version 10 (attached), this time via scripted bulk editing rather than
> as large patches.
Starting to look into this version now, but a small suggestion while
it's still fresh in mind: it might be easier, in future rounds, to
put all the files in a tarball and attach 'em as one big attachment.
At least with my mail setup, it's way easier to save off a tarball
and "tar xf" it than it is to individually save a dozen attachments.
I suspect that way might be easier on your end, too.
There's some value in posting a patchset as separate attachments
when it's possible to just apply the patches in series; Munro's patch
tester knows what to do with that, but not with a tarball AFAIK.
But in this case, there's little hope that the patch tester would
get it right anyhow.
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Peter Geoghegan||2018-03-14 18:14:05||Re: Parallel index creation does not properly cleanup after error|
|Previous Message||David Steele||2018-03-14 18:08:19||Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask|