Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class
Date: 2025-12-17 15:29:56
Message-ID: 790d3736-19e4-4e37-8c9b-52a0c09e5da5@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17.12.25 08:07, Peter Smith wrote:
> 0. AFAIK, anything named with a "pg_" prefix generally means that the
> named thing is intended for PG internal use, right?

This might be a convention, but it's not enforced by the system, except
for some object types like schemas and tablespaces.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-12-17 15:31:04 Re: [PATCH] Add regression test for aggregate NULL behavior
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-12-17 15:29:31 Re: pgsql: Revert "Avoid requiring Spanish locale to test NLS infrastructur