Re: pg_class.relistemp

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_class.relistemp
Date: 2011-07-14 19:19:59
Message-ID: 7903.1310671199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> BTW, if we're dumping relistemp, we're going to need to notify every
>> maker of a PostgreSQL admin interface before we release 9.1.

> Are they not testing our 9.1 betas?

There has never, ever, been a guarantee that the system catalogs don't
change across versions. Anybody issuing such queries should expect to
have to retest them and possibly change them in each new major release.
I see nothing to sweat about here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2011-07-14 19:46:26 Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-07-14 19:17:01 Re: per-column generic option