Re: AW: AW: fmgr changes not yet ported to AIX

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: fmgr changes not yet ported to AIX
Date: 2000-07-27 13:53:27
Message-ID: 7902.964706007@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
>> It seems to me that the real problem here is that someone tried to
>> take shortcuts in the AIX dynloader code.

> actually most other ports do it that way. e.g. FreeBSD
> so I guess that is why it is done like that.

Hmm, good point. I wonder why we don't see problems with them? Perhaps
the underlying functions have the right signatures on those platforms.

>> + void
>> + pg_dlclose(void *handle)
>> + {
>> + dlclose(h);

> you mean: dlclose(handle);

Ooops :-(. Thanks for the correction.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffery Collins 2000-07-27 13:55:02 Re: [GENERAL] Some questions on user defined types and functions.
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-07-27 13:20:18 AW: AW: fmgr changes not yet ported to AIX