Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish
Date: 2020-02-17 07:24:12
Message-ID: 78b1f221-b946-4977-611c-e96963925168@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/02/14 15:45, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:47:19PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> logical_rewrite_truncate_v1.patch adds the description of
>> LogicalRewriteTruncate into the doc. This needs to be
>> back-patched to v10 where commit 249cf070e3 introduced
>> LogicalRewriteTruncate event.
>
> Indeed. You just be careful about the number of fields for morerows,
> as that's not the same across branches.
>
>> gss_open_server_v1.patch adds the description of GSSOpenServer
>> into the doc and update the code in pgstat_get_wait_client().
>> This needs to be applied in v12 where commit b0b39f72b9 introduced
>> GSSOpenServer event.
>>
>> gss_open_server_for_master_v1.patch does not only what the above
>> patch does but also update wait event enum into alphabetical order.
>> This needs to be applied in the master.
>
> Thanks for splitting things. All that looks correct to me.

Thanks for the review! Pushed the patches for
LogicalRewriteTruncate and GSSOpenServer.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-02-17 07:30:00 Re: Wait event that should be reported while waiting for WAL archiving to finish
Previous Message Takashi Menjo 2020-02-17 07:15:48 RE: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer