Re: BUG #4748: hash join and sort-merge join make different results

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Roman Kononov <kononov(at)ftml(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #4748: hash join and sort-merge join make different results
Date: 2009-04-04 04:32:00
Message-ID: 7889.1238819520@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Roman Kononov <kononov(at)ftml(dot)net> writes:
> On 2009-04-03 14:57 Tom Lane said the following:
>> I think we could fix this by having interval_hash() duplicate the
>> total-span calculation done by interval_cmp_internal, and then return
>> the hash of the resulting TimeOffset. This is going to break existing
>> hash indexes on intervals, but there seems little choice...

> Consider hashing the result of justify_interval().

Uh, what's your point? We have to match interval_eq, not
justify_interval.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-04 05:02:32 Re: BUG #4748: hash join and sort-merge join make different results
Previous Message Roman Kononov 2009-04-04 03:52:52 Re: BUG #4748: hash join and sort-merge join make different results