Re: Wrong statistics for size of XLOG_SWITCH during pg_waldump.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, ahsan(dot)hadi(at)highgo(dot)ca, horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Wrong statistics for size of XLOG_SWITCH during pg_waldump.
Date: 2021-03-19 09:27:10
Message-ID: 785ae632-3c4f-f291-d2b7-c2a08fab103b@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/03/19 15:06, Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com wrote:
>>>> But 0 value maybe looks strange, so in current version I show it like >below:
>>>> Type N (%) Record size (%) FPI size (%) Combined size (%)
>>>> ---- - --- ----------- --- -------- --- ------------- --- ...
>>>> XLOG/SWITCH_JUNK - ( -) 11006248 ( 72.26) - ( -) 11006248 ( 65.78)
>>>> Transaction/COMMIT 10 ( 0.03) 340 ( 0.00) 0 ( 0.00) 340 ( 0.00)
>>>
>>> I just wanted to know why the "count" and "fpi_len" fields 0 are.
>>> So, it would be nice to have 0 values. Sorry for confusing you.
>>
>> Kato, it's not clear to me if you were asking for - to be changed back to 0?
>>
>> You marked the patch as Ready for Committer so I assume not, but it would be
>> better to say clearly that you think this patch is ready for a committer to look at.
>
> Yes, I don't think it needs to be changed back to 0.
> I think this patch is ready for a committer to look at.

What's the use case of this feature? I read through this thread briefly,
but I'm still not sure how useful this feature is.

Horiguchi-san reported one issue upthread; --stats=record shows
two lines for Transaction/COMMIT record. Probably this should be
fixed separately.

Horiguchi-san,
Do you have updated version of that bug-fix patch?
Or you started another thread for that issue?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-03-19 10:10:24 RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Previous Message Yugo NAGATA 2021-03-19 09:17:26 Re: Columns correlation and adaptive query optimization