Hello,
07.01.2022 09:26, Japin Li wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2022 at 03:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> In any case, if we do need same() to implement the identical
> behavior to bpchareq(), then the other solution isn't sufficient
> either.
>
> So in short, it seems like we ought to do some compatibility testing
> and see if this code misbehaves at all with an index created by the
> old code. I don't particularly want to do that ... any volunteers?
>
> Thanks for your patch, it looks good to me. I'm not sure how to test this.
I will test it tomorrow.
Best regards,
Alexander