Re: REPACK and naming

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REPACK and naming
Date: 2025-09-24 11:12:44
Message-ID: 7828e6e5-7b97-4c75-b651-df372acaa4ca@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-09-18 Th 6:53 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> I highly doubt that anybody is going to be confused in the slightest
> about what the REPACK command does, or that they would start to think
> about when did they PACK anything before. That sort of argument seems
> entirely artificial, and that is not how people think.

I agree.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-09-24 11:14:47 "openssl" should not be optional
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2025-09-24 11:12:13 Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?