| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
| Date: | 2001-01-23 21:46:12 |
| Message-ID: | 7826.980286372@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc pgsql-patches |
> didn't Tom have an objection to this, or, at least, a concern about
> forcing v2 specs?
>>
>> Oh, I remember now. Tom Lane was saying that we should vote if we want
>> v2 or v3 specs for ODBC. He said moving to v3 in beta may be a problem,
>> and you said this can be easily backed out, so I applied it. I think we
>> are stuck with v2 anyway.
I agree, we probably need to stick with the v2 spec for now. I just
wanted to see if anyone thought that changing the reported version
number would be a better patch ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cedar Cox | 2001-01-24 09:52:22 | Re: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: more odbc patches |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-01-23 21:22:02 | RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-23 22:43:07 | Re: [PATCHES] binary operators on integers |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-01-23 21:22:02 | RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |