| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-testers <pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules |
| Date: | 2010-10-11 23:20:44 |
| Message-ID: | 7815.1286839244@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-admin pgsql-testers |
Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> Turns out the make problem was actually one of my issuing 'make'. IE, the resolution was simply issuing 'gmake' explicitly. To add some special sauce to the recipe, the 'make' of the core server went without a hitch; was only the build of modules which did not work.... Kinda misleading.
That is interesting. What exactly is plain "make" invoking? In the
past, people trying to use non-GNU make have not gotten anywhere near
getting through a whole build --- and we've certainly not removed any
of our gmake-isms. It seems like you must have something that's sort
of 89% gmake, but not quite all the way there.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Timon | 2010-10-12 09:29:53 | wrong indexes sizes on index page |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-10-11 22:11:25 | Two quick patchs for the querytool |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kasia Tuszynska | 2010-10-12 17:25:55 | two questions about pg 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Lou Picciano | 2010-10-11 21:06:35 | Re: build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kasia Tuszynska | 2010-10-12 17:25:55 | two questions about pg 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Lou Picciano | 2010-10-11 21:06:35 | Re: build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules |