Re: Add pg_partition_tree to doc index

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add pg_partition_tree to doc index
Date: 2018-11-29 07:35:06
Message-ID: 78127108-cfc9-4e03-48ea-909868dea60a@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Michael,

On 2018/11/29 16:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> d5eec4ee has added pg_partition_tree, unfortunately it is not showing in
> the documentation index. Please see attached to fix the mistake.

Oh, I wasn't aware of this index and that the tag <indexterm> is meant for
that.

> Any thoughts or objections?

It's an oversight. Thanks for fixing it.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kato, Sho 2018-11-29 07:40:29 RE: Planning time of Generic plan for a table partitioned into a lot
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-29 07:27:19 Add pg_partition_tree to doc index