Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Date: 2010-03-09 14:47:12
Message-ID: 77d4f126-2b8a-11df-9b6a-001cc0cda50c@msgid.mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Do keep the postgres xlog on a seperate ext2 partition for best
performance. Other than that, xfs is definitely a good performer.

Mike Stone

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message david 2010-03-09 14:49:10 Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Previous Message Ing. Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda 2010-03-09 14:34:11 Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics