Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey(at)proteus-tech(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-06-05 19:12:08
Message-ID: 77D201D9-F009-47AE-81C4-9271114A9E87@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www


> On Jun 5, 2018, at 12:06, Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey(at)proteus-tech(dot)com> wrote:
> Doesn't that 20 years of results pretty clearly demonstrate that this community does not gain an advantage for adopting a CoC?

Not at all. The need for a CoC is not theoretical. Real people, recently, have left the community due to harassment, and there was no system within the community to report and deal with that harassment.

What we do have is 20 years of people demonstrating reasonable good judgment, which we can conclude will apply to a CoC committee as well.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-06-05 19:16:07 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Benjamin Scherrey 2018-06-05 19:06:24 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-06-05 19:16:07 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Benjamin Scherrey 2018-06-05 19:06:24 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-06-05 19:16:07 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-06-05 19:08:33 Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-06-05 19:16:07 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Benjamin Scherrey 2018-06-05 19:06:24 Re: Code of Conduct plan