Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: 2026-04-20 07:54:19
Message-ID: 779FB055-4174-4460-B07C-A6C092C6C9EA@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Apr 20, 2026, at 15:47, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
>> It was discussed earlier [1] and the concerns about possibly excessive
>> resource consumptions were addressed by [2]. So I think it the fix was just
>> forgotten. Attached here.
>
> Sorry, I attached wrong patch. This is what I meant.
>
> --
> Antonin Houska
> Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
> <0001-Do-not-check-the-REPLICATION-attribute-when-running-.patch>

In my test, I found the exact same issue and I was about to post a fix that is the same as v1. So, v1 looks good to me.

BTW, Antonin, can you please take a look at [1] that is the other issue I found with repack.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/10DD5E13-B45D-44F1-BE08-C63E00ABCAC0%40gmail.com

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2026-04-20 07:56:23 Re: [BUG]: WHERE CURRENT OF cursor fail on tables that have virtual generated columns
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2026-04-20 07:47:36 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]