Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuumdb?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: khj(at)cs(dot)appstate(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuumdb?
Date: 1999-01-31 17:21:40
Message-ID: 7787.917803300@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> [Note to pgsql-hackers: I can't figure out why I have this and Kenneth
> doesn't. Can someone else figure out why?]

vacuumdb was added post-6.4, so it won't appear in 6.4.* tarfiles.
It wouldn't appear in your CVS pull either, if you pulled the REL6_4 tag
rather than the main branch.

There's no reason the script wouldn't work with 6.4, as far as I can
see.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-01-31 17:40:59 Re: [HACKERS] Patches
Previous Message Goran Thyni 1999-01-31 15:52:39 Patch (was: tough locale bug)