Re: Linux mis-reporting memory

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: adamtaunowilliams(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux mis-reporting memory
Date: 2007-10-02 22:17:53
Message-ID: 776F2B78-7991-4537-A2D0-96636E614B37@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Oct 2, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> I'm leaning towards "top on linux == dumb".
>
> I disagree, it just isn't the appropriate tool for the job. What top
> tells you is lots of correct information, it just isn't the right
> information.

If it is in fact including shared memory as 'cached', then no, the
information it's providing is not correct.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Williamson 2007-10-02 22:39:51 Re: Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement.
Previous Message Dan Langille 2007-10-02 22:02:20 Re: Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement.