Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished

From: Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished
Date: 2026-11-12 05:36:14
Message-ID: 77656396-056d-41ac-a0f4-4c61bb849a30@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Nov12, 2026 at 12:44 PM shveta malik wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 8:04 PM Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm helping to merge the changes into 0001 and preparing patches for
> > all branches, hoping to close this item soon.
> >
>
> Overall, the patches look good to me. Just a nit: the name "pub" looks
> very generic for a test spec shared by many permutations. Perhaps we
> can name it "pub_test_detach" or "pub_detach".

Thanks for reviewing.

Since there's only one publication in this file, I think the current
name is fine as we don't need to distinguish it from any other
publication. Similar names are also used in other tests.

--
Best Regards,
Zhijie Hou

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nisha Moond 2026-11-12 05:59:24 Re: Crashes on a partition whose concurrent detach never finished
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-11-12 05:23:33 Re: Injection point: fix race condition between attach and cleanup