Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Date: 2021-01-16 19:12:30
Message-ID: 7764ee7b-bb28-63a3-0462-34b2d8a2e107@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/16/21 7:39 PM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:02 PM Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> There are no existing applications, so for PostgreSQL, it wouldn't be an
>> issue.
>>
>>
> Yes we don't have but the main function of ALTER TABLE foo ADD SYSTEM
> VERSIONING
> is to add system versioning functionality to existing application

I haven't looked at this patch in a while, but I hope that ALTER TABLE t
ADD SYSTEM VERSIONING is not adding any columns. That is a bug if it does.
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2021-01-16 19:28:27 Re: LET clause
Previous Message Surafel Temesgen 2021-01-16 18:39:38 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table