Re: PG19 regression in ecd9288624a: JSON_ARRAY() indexes that go stale

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com" <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: PG19 regression in ecd9288624a: JSON_ARRAY() indexes that go stale
Date: 2026-11-04 18:28:00
Message-ID: 77626E4D-6B17-4A1D-AA14-C892050DD895@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 4 Nov 2026, at 23:04, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2026-11-03 22:37:52 -0800, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
>> AI found this while testing v5 and prepared the attached patch; I
>> haven't manually reviewed the code yet.
>
> Personally I think dropping unverified AI code onto the list has almost always
> negative value, it just increases the already really high noise floor even
> further. We all can ask LLMs to vomit out code. Putting it on the list
> basically just means you're asking somebody else to do the actual work.

Do you think there was any human interaction in this thread before your message?

I like Nik's post transparency. There's no way to escape LLMs. They exist.

It would be great if we could split every post into two parts: human text and AI
output. So that humans could talk to humans and help improve mental models to each other, not
standing on a way of AI in doing leg work.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-11-04 18:45:35 Re: PG19 regression in ecd9288624a: JSON_ARRAY() indexes that go stale
Previous Message Greg Burd 2026-11-04 18:23:50 Re: Hash index inserts serialise on the metapage tuple counter