Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o
Date: 2002-01-18 17:15:51
Message-ID: 7747.1011374151@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I think we should scrutinize this as carefully as we can, but apply it
>> if at all possible.

> Interesting solution. I defer to your opinion on this.

Okay, I've applied it ;-). I studied the code carefully and also
exercised as many combinations as I could think of. I think it's okay.

You might want to run pg_indent on pg_backup_db.c however ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-18 17:19:59 Re: [PATCHES] guc
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-18 17:02:31 Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o