From: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
Date: | 2020-08-28 18:10:34 |
Message-ID: | 773B38BD-E27F-4C49-8678-B316261C9189@yandex-team.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 28 авг. 2020 г., в 18:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> написал(а):
> In the case
> you mention, I think we should view that as a problem with clog rather
> than a problem with the table, and thus out of scope.
I don't think so. ISTM It's the same problem of xmax<relfrozenxid actually, just hidden behind detoasing.
Our regular heap_check was checking xmin\xmax invariants for tables, but failed to recognise the problem in toast (while toast was accessible until CLOG truncation).
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2020-08-28 18:23:56 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2020-08-28 18:08:34 | Re: MultiXact\SLRU buffers configuration |