| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Beta time? |
| Date: | 2012-05-04 16:58:51 |
| Message-ID: | 7735.1336150731@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon? Was that
>> resolved?
> I have yet to see a confirmed date, guys. If we expect any support from
> the packagers and/or the advocacy volunteers, then people need at least
> a week's notice, probably more.
I haven't seen anybody positively say we can't do a wrap next Thursday
and release Monday, so I've been assuming that's what will happen.
If there are reasons to think it won't work, let's hear 'em now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-04 21:44:43 | pgsql: Overdue code review for transaction-level advisory locks patch. |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-05-04 16:34:22 | Re: Beta time? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-05-04 16:59:41 | Re: Future In-Core Replication |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-04 16:56:22 | Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? |