Re: 10.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 16:16:54
Message-ID: 7719.1463156214@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> On Friday, May 13, 2016, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> Let's just go with 2016 instead then.

>> We tried, that, "Postgres95". ;-)

> Even better, we're being retro! It's in style! ;)

It would sure put a premium on not slipping releases past December.
If you don't rebrand, you look silly; if you do, you've lost the
ability to put out a new major release in the next year.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 16:10:54 from Stephen Frost

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-05-13 16:22:00 Re: 10.0
Previous Message David Fetter 2016-05-13 16:12:44 Re: 10.0