Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-11 14:59:43
Message-ID: 7715.1276268383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> How about no operator at all? It won't be as cool to read, but
> consider, the arguments are text and text, not involving any hstore type
> at all, so whatever operator you choose is in practice blocked from
> everyone everywhere. No one could ever implement another key/value
> system that uses a similar interface. Or use the operator for anything
> else involving strings.

Yeah, that's a good point. Maybe we should just deprecate the operator
altogether.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-06-11 15:15:24 Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2010-06-11 14:58:59 pg_regress --use-existing does not appear in --help