"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> this patch contains function ArmorCustomVariables. This function set flag
> armored on any custom variable. From this moment only superuser can change
> this variable.
Why is this a good idea? Why don't you just fix the problem as
previously agreed, namely make the GUC context values work properly
for custom variables?
regards, tom lane