Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Date: 2009-08-04 16:19:53
Message-ID: 77056239FB4A5405C4B24EDE@teje
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Dienstag, August 04, 2009 10:28:48 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> While I've been poking at the pg_dump issues, it's occurred to me that
> changing the default would be a great forcing function for finding out
> any lurking problems.

+1

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-04 16:21:54 Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2009-08-04 16:19:01 Re: mixed, named notation support