Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2?
Date: 1999-05-10 16:46:47
Message-ID: 7697.926354807@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>>>>>> o It is repoted that NetBSD/m68k has bee broken since you put the
>>>>>>> alignment stuff into configure, I'm not sure though.
>>
>> Hmm. What numbers is configure producing for the various ALIGNOF
>> values? (Look in config.h.)

> #define ALIGNOF_SHORT 2
> #define ALIGNOF_INT 2
> #define ALIGNOF_LONG 2
> #define ALIGNOF_LONG_LONG_INT 2
> #define ALIGNOF_DOUBLE 2
> #define MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF 2

OK, I guess that's reasonable for m68k hardware. I wonder whether
anything is assuming that MAXALIGN is at least 4...

>> What exactly happens when you try a
>> createdb? Can you connect to the template1 database and do SQL stuff
>> after initdb, without having done a createdb?

> "psql template1" gets coredumped. But 6.4.2 clients can connect to the
> backend. Seems something going wrong with libpq stuffs.

Do you mean that psql itself (not the backend) is coredumping? Can you
provide a backtrace from the corefile?

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-10 16:47:36 Re: [HACKERS] A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with aggregation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-05-10 16:46:27 Re: [GENERAL] cluster truncates table name?