Re: repack: fix a bug to reject deferrable primary key fallback for concurrent mode

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: repack: fix a bug to reject deferrable primary key fallback for concurrent mode
Date: 2026-04-30 18:54:02
Message-ID: 769631.1777575242@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Thanks, pushed it now.

So, no sooner had 4b2aa4b39 removed tests of REPACK CONCURRENTLY
from the core regression tests than 832e220d9 put one back.
BF member thorntail is broken again.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM 2026-04-30 19:01:04 Re: Limit GRAPH_TABLE path combinations to prevent memory exhaustion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-04-30 18:35:55 Re: Interest in hosting a buildfarm animal