| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question about function body checking and 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-03-23 16:59:09 |
| Message-ID: | 7685.1111597149@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov> writes:
> On Mar 22, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Tony Caduto wrote:
>> Also if you happen to use PLperl or any of the other ones, do they
>> actually do better checking than PLpgsql? Last time I used a PLperl
>> function it didn't do any checking at creation either.
> I think (from experience rather than knowledge) that that is still the
> case as of 8.0.1. I know Tom Lane and I had a brief discussion on one
> of the lists on the subject a month or two ago, but I can't seem to
> find the emails.
CVS-tip createlang still thinks that plpgsql is the only standard PL
that has a validator procedure; therefore the others don't do any
checking at CREATE FUNCTION whatsoever.
It would be reasonable for someone to step up and improve this ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-03-23 16:59:57 | Re: Command Prompt on Window version |
| Previous Message | A. Mous | 2005-03-23 16:56:33 | Re: Simple query takes a long time on win2K |