Re: [PATCH] Cross-reference comments on signal handling logic

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cross-reference comments on signal handling logic
Date: 2021-03-01 18:22:35
Message-ID: 7678CCD1-4F9E-4A95-ABE9-9D54F6D04FFE@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 17, 2021, at 11:51 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> <v1-0001-Comments-and-cross-references-for-signal-handling.patch>

In src/backend/postmaster/interrupt.c:

+ * These handlers are NOT used by normal user backends as they do not support

vs.

+ * Most backends use this handler.

These two comments seem to contradict. If interrupt.c contains handlers that normal user backends to not use, then how can it be that most backends use one of the handlers in the file?

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Juan José Santamaría Flecha 2021-03-01 18:39:49 Re: [PATCH] Bug fix in initdb output
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-01 18:16:08 Re: [PATCH] Bug fix in initdb output