Is that VACUUM normal ?

From: Jean-Christophe Boggio <cat(at)thefreecat(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Is that VACUUM normal ?
Date: 2001-02-20 07:25:11
Message-ID: 7672690221.20010220082511@thefreecat.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi all,

3 hours ago I started :

myplace# vacuum verbose analyze gains;
NOTICE: --Relation gains--
NOTICE: Pages 44547: Changed 406, reaped 1941, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 4099959: Vac
61464, Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 2, UnUsed 1281, MinLen 67, MaxLen 267; Re-using: Fre
e/Avail. Space 6900268/6899660; EndEmpty/Avail. Pages 0/1917. CPU 8.71s/23.58u s
ec.
NOTICE: Index ix_gains_idmembreidcondition: Pages 18532; Tuples 4099959: Delete
d 10846. CPU 3.09s/4.39u sec.
NOTICE: Index actegen_gains_key: Pages 10291; Tuples 4099959: Deleted 10845. CP
U 1.98s/4.11u sec.
NOTICE: Index idcondition_gains_key: Pages 8420; Tuples 4099959: Deleted 10845.
CPU 1.93s/4.14u sec.
NOTICE: Index dategain_gains_key: Pages 15090; Tuples 4099959: Deleted 10845. C
PU 3.46s/4.18u sec.
NOTICE: Index gains_idgain_key: Pages 10124; Tuples 4099959: Deleted 10845. CPU
2.33s/4.11u sec.

and now it's stuck here for more than 2 hours now, top says :

PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
9790 postgres 16 0 19628 19M 18536 R 99,2 2,0 212:15 postmaster


I use PG 7.03 on a 2x PIII-800 with 1Gb RAM with UWSCSI disks.

Table is about 4M tuples (as you can see), data file is :
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 364929024 fév 20 08:15 /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/mybase/gains

It shouldn't be THAT long ! I think a few days ago it was 10mn long

Our site is down until I either :
- stop the vacuum but then with no analysis information what will be
the performances ?
- wait until it finishes but what year will that be ?

Anyone has an idea of what's going on ?

--
Jean-Christophe Boggio
cat(at)thefreecat(dot)org
Independant Consultant and Developer
Delphi, Linux, Perl, PostgreSQL

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Christophe Boggio 2001-02-20 09:30:53 vacuum analyze again...
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-02-20 07:04:14 Re: Weird indices