| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Help with gram.y (UNDER) |
| Date: | 2000-05-24 16:52:45 |
| Message-ID: | 7665.959187165@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
> Does the '(' have some kind of second-class status as a token that would
> cause this wierdness?
No ... very bizarre. I think you must be introducing some kind of
ambiguity into the grammar, but I can't quite see what. Are you
getting any sort of warnings out of bison?
Might be worth turning on the logfile option (forget if it's -v or -l)
and looking at the interpreted productions just to make sure bison
is reading things the same way you thought you wrote them.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Ivar Helbekkmo | 2000-05-24 17:03:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: interactive pgsql book |
| Previous Message | Jeff Hoffmann | 2000-05-24 16:46:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: interactive pgsql book |