Re: Native XML

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Native XML
Date: 2011-02-28 15:51:12
Message-ID: 7632.1298908272@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> xpath_table is severely broken by design IMNSHO. We need a new design,
> but I'm reluctant to work on that until someone does LATERAL, because a
> replacement would be much nicer to design with it than without it.

Well, maybe I'm missing something, but I don't really understand why
xpath_table's design is so unreasonable. Also, what would a better
solution look like exactly? (Feel free to assume LATERAL is available.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-28 16:13:34 Re: PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-02-28 15:40:01 Re: Native XML