Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Date: 2020-03-05 13:48:38
Message-ID: 76066434-648f-f567-437b-54853b43398f@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

We discussed the $SUBJECT six years ago at the following thread.
https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGYkF+CvpOMdxaO=+aNAzc1Oo9O4LqWo50MxpvFj+0VOw@mail.gmail.com

Seems our consensus at that discussion was to leave a fallback
promotion for a release or two for debugging purpose or as
an emergency method because fast promotion might have
some issues, and then to remove it later. Now, more than six years
have already passed since that discussion. Is there still
any reason to keep a fallback promotion? If nothing, I'd like to
drop it from v13.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luis Carril 2020-03-05 13:51:35 Re: Option to dump foreign data in pg_dump
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-03-05 13:46:54 Re: Allow auto_explain to log plans before queries are executed