RE: Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication

From: Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Hiroshi Yanagisawa <hir-yanagisawa(at)ut(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Re: User defined data types in Logical Replication
Date: 2017-12-04 09:26:00
Message-ID: 75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A6CF154@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> From: Huong Dangminh [mailto:huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com]
> I attached a patch based on Sawada-san's patch with a bit of messages
> modified and remove the above check.
> Could somebody check it for me or should I add it into CF?

Sorry, I have added this thread to the next CF.

---
Thanks and best regards,
Dang Minh Huong
NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd.
http://www.nec-solutioninnovators.co.jp/en/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raúl Marín Rodríguez 2017-12-04 09:27:39 Re: [HACKERS] pgbench more operators & functions
Previous Message Adrien Nayrat 2017-12-04 08:48:44 Re: Doc tweak for huge_pages?