Re: TODO <-> Commitfest

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO <-> Commitfest
Date: 2008-08-28 05:01:52
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On the other hand we could just put the onus for this on the patch
> submitters themselves. That is, make a policy "If you submit a patch
> which resolves a Todo item, please mark the Todo item as done if/when
> that patch is committed." Maybe they forget to do it, but it's
> probably still a step up from our current strategy.

Alternatively, suggest that the email message submitting the patch
mentions that "this resolves TODO item so-and-so". Then the committer
would know to go fix the TODO item.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2008-08-28 08:04:06 Re: Proposal to sync SET ROLE and pg_stat_activity
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-08-28 02:54:54 Re: Auto-explain patch