| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO <-> Commitfest |
| Date: | 2008-08-28 05:01:52 |
| Message-ID: | 759.1219899712@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On the other hand we could just put the onus for this on the patch
> submitters themselves. That is, make a policy "If you submit a patch
> which resolves a Todo item, please mark the Todo item as done if/when
> that patch is committed." Maybe they forget to do it, but it's
> probably still a step up from our current strategy.
Alternatively, suggest that the email message submitting the patch
mentions that "this resolves TODO item so-and-so". Then the committer
would know to go fix the TODO item.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2008-08-28 08:04:06 | Re: Proposal to sync SET ROLE and pg_stat_activity |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-08-28 02:54:54 | Re: Auto-explain patch |