From: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Date: | 2008-10-03 14:20:15 |
Message-ID: | 758d5e7f0810030720t4779cb93ud3cc985bd023b3e3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, I have a stupid question- torn pages are a problem, but only during
> recovery. Recovery is (I assume) a fairly rare condition- if data
> corruption is going to happen, it's most likely to happen during normal
> operation. So why not just turn off CRC checksumming during recovery, or at
> least treat it as a much less critical error? During recovery, if the CRC
> checksum matches, we can assume the page is good- not only not corrupt, but
> not torn either. If the CRC checksum doesn't match, we don't panic, but
> maybe we do more careful analysis of the page to make sure that only the
> hint bits are wrong. Or maybe not. It's only during normal operation that
> a CRC checksum failure would be considered critical.
Well:
1. database half-writes the page X to disk, and there is power outage.
2. we regain the power
2. during recovery database replay all WAL-logged pages. The X page
was not WAL-logged, thus it is not replayed.
3. when replaying is finished, everything looks OK at this point
4. user runs a SELECT which hits page X. Oops, we have a checksum
mismatch.
Best regards,
Dawid Kuroczko
--
.................. ``The essence of real creativity is a certain
: *Dawid Kuroczko* : playfulness, a flitting from idea to idea
: qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com : without getting bogged down by fixated demands.''
`..................' Sherkaner Underhill, A Deepness in the Sky, V. Vinge
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-10-03 14:32:33 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Previous Message | Brian Hurt | 2008-10-03 13:36:19 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |