Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

From: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
Date: 2005-06-30 21:21:07
Message-ID: 758d5e7f05063014212809fdd1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 6/30/05, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> > Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
> >
> > I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size().
>
> I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot
> think of anything better at the moment though (maybe pg_component_size,
> but that's equally random) :-(
>
> Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)

pg_diskspace_size()
pg_diskusage_size()
pg_media_used_size()
pg_allocated_size()
pg_diskspace_used()

Regards,
Dawid

PS: Yep, they aren't good...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-30 21:27:08 Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2005-06-30 21:19:33 Re: WAL oddities (8.0.3)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-30 21:27:08 Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2005-06-30 21:16:11 Re: Constraint Exclusion (Partitioning) - Initial Review