Re: Rewriting PL/Python's typeio code

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Anthony Bykov <a(dot)bykov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rewriting PL/Python's typeio code
Date: 2017-11-16 21:25:03
Message-ID: 7578.1510867503@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Anthony Bykov <a(dot)bykov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
>> 1. In file plpy_exec.c there is a typo on line 347:
>> "... We use the result and resultin[should be here "g"?] variables...

> No, "resultin" is the name of the variable. Maybe that wasn't a good
> choice of name, though --- do you have a better idea?

After some thought I went with "result_in", which hopefully looks less
like a typo. Thanks again for reviewing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-11-16 21:37:21 Re: Schedule for migration to pglister
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-16 20:54:07 Re: [HACKERS] ginInsertCleanup called from vacuum could still miss tuples to be deleted