Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm thinking to commit the patch. But I have one question; is it ok to
> back-patch? Since the patch changes the command tags for some commands,
> for example, which might break the existing event trigger functions
> using TG_TAG if we back-patch it. Or we should guarantee the compatibility of
> command tag within the same major version?
I would not back-patch this. I don't think it's enough of a bug
to justify taking any compatibility risks for.
regards, tom lane