Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)cygnus(dot)com>, gerhard(at)bigfoot(dot)de, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix for fetchone() and fetchmany() in Python interface
Date: 2001-08-15 22:17:51
Message-ID: 757.997913871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> If it has taken months for someone report report it and fix it, it can't
> be that major.

Good point --- but the whole Python interface is not very heavily used
AFAICT.

My initial reaction was the same as yours: put it in current sources,
but don't backpatch. But with both Fernando and Neil vouching for the
correctness of the patch, I'm willing to assume it's okay.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-15 23:24:51 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-08-15 22:06:54 Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords