Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Date: 2018-05-02 01:11:13
Message-ID: 753756fa-1d83-2738-9415-f09df7845387@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/05/01 20:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 4/26/18 05:03, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/04/26 13:01, David Rowley wrote:
>>> The attached small patch removes the mention that partitioned tables
>>> cannot have foreign keys defined on them.
>>>
>>> This has been supported since 3de241db
>>
>> I noticed also that the item regarding row triggers might be obsolete as
>> of 86f575948c7, thanks again to Alvaro! So, I updated your patch to take
>> care of that.
>
> committed both

Thank you.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-05-02 01:26:17 Re: A few warnings on Windows
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-05-02 01:10:30 Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions