Re: Hash Functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hash Functions
Date: 2017-05-12 22:38:55
Message-ID: 75339452-cb75-d4d2-13db-f2c3b0d06300@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/12/17 18:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think for logical replication the tuple should appear as being in the
> parent table, not the partition. No?

Logical replication replicates base table to base table. How those
tables are tied together into a partitioned table or an inheritance tree
is up to the system catalogs on each side.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2017-05-12 23:36:26 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-05-12 22:13:52 Re: Hash Functions