| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: small parallel restore optimization |
| Date: | 2009-03-09 02:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | 7531.1236564872@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Could you use a different static PQExpBuffer on each thread?
>> pthread_getspecific sort of thing, only to be used on Windows.
> For MSVC we could declare it with "_declspec(thread)" and it would be
> allocated in thread-local storage, but it looks like this isn't
> supported on Mingw.
Some googling suggests that thread-local storage is supported on latest
release (not clear if it's exactly the same syntax though :-().
Worst case, we could say that parallel restore isn't supported on
mingw. I'm not entirely sure why we bother with that platform at all...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-03-09 02:34:15 | Re: small parallel restore optimization |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-03-09 01:45:44 | Re: small parallel restore optimization |