| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13 |
| Date: | 2022-03-10 17:05:31 |
| Message-ID: | 74ed4669-682b-ae77-c1e5-5becd07bd2e6@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/10/22 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 3/6/22 17:33, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> A sequence of
>>> pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck;
>>> would make sense.
>> See
>> <https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/191df23bd25eb5546b0989d71ae92747151f9f39>
> Does this detect the problem at hand?
>
>
AIUI, amcheck doesn't check gist indexes, hence Andres' "even if it
wouldn't even help in this case". So no.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-10 17:11:36 | Re: role self-revocation |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-10 16:48:16 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |