Re: locked reads for atomics

> On Nov 28, 2023, at 05:00, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> External Email
>
> Here's a v2 of the patch set in which I've attempted to address all
> feedback. I've also added a pg_write_membarrier_u* pair of functions that
> provide an easy way to write to an atomic variable with full barrier
> semantics. In the generic implementation, these are just aliases for an
> atomic exchange.
>
> 0002 demonstrates how these functions might be used to eliminate the
> arch_lck spinlock, which is only ever used for one boolean variable. My
> hope is that the membarrier functions make eliminating spinlocks for
> non-performance-sensitive code easy to reason about.
>
> (We might be able to use a pg_atomic_flag instead for 0002, but that code
> seems intended for a slightly different use-case and has more complicated
> barrier semantics.)
>
> --
> Nathan Bossart
> Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Hi Nathan,

The patch looks good to me.

The patch adds two pairs of atomic functions that provide full-barrier semantics to atomic read/write operations. The patch also includes an example of how this new functions can be used to replace spin locks.

The patch applies cleanly to HEAD. “make check-world” also runs cleanly with no error. I am moving it to Ready for Committers.

Regards,
Yong