Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Date: 2022-09-30 23:05:38
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:00:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... and now requires double alignment ... did you fix its typalign?

> Nope, I missed that, thanks for pointing it out. Should we move ai_privs
> to the beginning of the struct, too?

Don't see any point, there won't be any padding. If we ever change the
sizeof(Oid), or add more fields, we can consider what to do then.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2022-09-30 23:11:09 Re: [BUG] parenting a PK constraint to a self-FK one (Was: Self FK oddity when attaching a partition)
Previous Message Zheng Li 2022-09-30 22:44:16 Bloom filter Pushdown Optimization for Merge Join