Re: [17] collation provider "builtin"

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [17] collation provider "builtin"
Date: 2023-12-29 18:42:18
Message-ID: 74712d97c9cdf014c8a34afa22b948a2e85ec69b.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 15:08 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> > I haven't studied the details yet but +1 for this idea.  It models
> > what we are actually doing.
>
> +1 agreed

I am combining this discussion with my "built-in CTYPE provider"
proposal here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/804eb67b37f41d3afeb2b6469cbe8bfa79c562cc.camel@j-davis.com

and the most recent patch is posted there. Having a built-in provider
is more useful if it also offers a "C.UTF-8" locale that is superior to
the libc locale of the same name.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-12-29 19:14:46 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-12-29 18:38:07 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs